English for Specific Purpose: Material Development
MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT IN ESP
Introduction
In language learning , material is anything which is
used to help to teach language learners. materials can be found in the form of
a textbook, a workbook, a cassette, a CD-Rom, a video, a photocopied handout, a
newspaper, a paragraph written on a whiteboard: anything which presents or
informs about the language being learned. (Tomlinson, 1998: xi).
Dudley-Evans, (1998:170 as cited in Nurpahmi) points
out that the role of material in ESP are as follows:
1.
As a source of language
In some situation, where English is a foreign language
not a second language, the ESP classroom may be almost the only source of
language. Materials then play a crucia role in exposing learners to the
language, which implies that the material need to present real language, as it
is used, and the full range that learners require.
Where the classroom is the primary source of
language, the material also need to maximize exposure to the language, for
instance, by providing additional material : not everything needs to be studied
in detail; interested learners will use for their own learning practice.
2.
As a learning support
As a learning support, material need to be reliable,
that is, to work to be consistent and to have some recognizable pattern. There
have been material published where each text is follow by ten comprehension
questions. To enhance learning, materials must involvelearners in thinking
about and using the language. The activities need to stimulate cognitive and
mechanical process. The learners also need a sense of progression.
3.
For motivation and stimulation
To stimulate and motivate, material need to be
challenging yet achievable; to offer new ideas and information whilstbeing
grounded in learners experience and knowledge; to encourage fun and creativity.
The exploitationneeds to match how the input would be used outside th elearning
situation and take account to th learners reality need to be clear.
4.
For references
The materials will need to tak e account of
differentlearning styles and allow for the explorer, who will follow through a
train of thought; the browser; who will work through methodically. This implies
that an important features is the overt organization of the material-through
informative content pages and index. Content pages that provide a matrix of
objectives, skills, language activity and topic are far more helpful.
Discussion
Hutchinson and Water (1987) state that there are
three possible ways of turning your course design into actual teaching
material:
1.
Select from existing material: material evaluation
2.
Write your own material: material development
3.
Modify existing material: material adaptation
In line with Hutchinson and Water opinion, Ana
Bocanegra-Valle (2010:144-145) point out that at its most basic level the
process of ESP materials development start from: first, evailable materials are
reviewed, evaluated and selected acording to different criteria and with
reference to a particular ESP course. Then, if there is a lack of materials, or
if materials available are not suitable according to such evaluation,
practitioners might be required to develop materials from abridge, extent and
refine, rewrite- in short, adapt the the available materialsfo a particular
learning situaition, ESP area, target group of learners, timing or set of
resources.
Lastly, because the materials is ongoing process, those
enganged in creating or adapting materials will to pilot test or perform
evaluative reviews so as
to adjust materials over time in response to implementation outcomes,
current trends in the field or research findings.
Evaluation is basically a matching process: matching
needs to evailabke solutions(Hutchinson and Water: 1987:97). Therefore,
material evaluation in ESP is a process to matching needs that is presenting
syllabus to available materials.
Furthermore, Hutchinsona nd Water (1987:97) devide the evaluation process
into four major steps: defining criteria by asking on what basis will you judge
materials and which criteria will be more important?; conducting
subjective analysis t know what realization of the criteria to know how
the material being evaluated realize the criteria; the last step is matching to
know how far the material match with the learner needs.
When adapting materials, the following criteria were
taken into consideration: importance of information needed for our students’
future career, language adequacy of study material as well as application of
already mastered communication skills in different contexts. ESP courses
worldwide are very often oriented towards development of reading comprehension.
Undoubtedly, such an orientation is appropriate if the students’ideas of their
future careers have more or less clear contours expecting that they will get a
job in some engineering branch. Many of our future graduates can hardly predict
the sphere of their professional activities. This reality has to be taken into
account when formulating the principal objective of the English language course
at the Faculty – a proportional development of all language skills. In
accordance with the current social trends, we should get rid of a rather
one-sided view of an engineer as an expert in some scientific field using his
English knowledge entirely for reading scientific literature. Engineering
activities involve much broader repertoire.
Harmer, 2001 and Lamie suggest technique in adapting
materials as follows:
1.
Add activities to those already suggested.
2.
Leave out activities that do not meet your learners’ needs.
3.
Replace or adapt activities or materials with:
suplemetary materials from other commercial materials; authentic materials;
teacher-created supplementary materials.
4.
Change the organizational structure of the activities,
for example pairs, small groups or whole class.
Material development refers to anything which is done
by writers, teachers or learners to provide sources of language input and
exploit those sources in ways which maximize the likelihood of intake: in other
words, the supplying of information about and/or experience of the language in
ways designed to promote language learning (Tomlinson, 1998:2).
Howard (104-105) explains the guidelines in Designing
Effective English Teaching Materials
1.
English language teaching materials should be contextualized
It is essential during the design stages that the
objectives of the curriculum, syllabus
or scheme within the designer’s institution are kept to the fore. Also it
should be contextualized to the experiences, realities and first languages of
the learners. in addition, materials should be contextualized to topics and theme that provide meaningful,
purposeful uses for the target language.
2.
Materials should be stimulate interaction and be
generative in terms of language
Language learning will be maximally enhanced if
materials designersare able to acknowledge the communication challenges
inherent in an interactive teaching
approach and address the different norms of interaction, such as preferred
personal space, for example, directly within their teaching materials.
3.
English language teaching materials should encourage
learners to develop learning skills and strategies
Hall (1995) stresses the importance of providing
learners with the confidence to persist in their attempts to find solutions
when they have initial difficulties in communicating. Strategies that can be
used such as rewarding and using facial expressions and body language
effectively can be fine-tuned with well
designed materials.
In addition, materials can provide evaluable
opportunities oe self- evaluation by providing the necessary meta language and
incorporating activities which encourage learners to assess th eir own learning
and language development.this can utilize the learners’ first language as well
as English. Some EFL course books, such as Ellis and Sinclair (1989), also
build in exercises for students to explore their own learning styles and
strategies.
a.
English language teaching materials should allow for a
focus on form as well as function
The aim of guideline 3 is to develop active, independent language
learners. to help meet this goal, materials also need to encourage learners to
take an analytical approach to the language in front of and around them, and to
form and test their own hypotheses about how language works (Nunan, 1988). Well
design materials can help considerably with this by alerting learners to
underlying forms and by providing opportunities for regulated practice in
addition to independent and creative expression.
b.
English language teaching materials should offer
opportunities for integrated language use
Ideally, materials can tend to focus on one particular skill in a
somewhat unnatural manner. Some courses have a major focus on productive
skills, and in these reading and listening become second-rate skill.
c.
English language teaching materials should be authentic
It is about the book’s author view that it is imperative for second
language learners to be regularly exposed in the classroom to real, unscripted
language to passages that have not been produced specifically for language
learning purposes. Materials designers shoul also aim for authentic spoken and
visual texts. Learners need to hear, see and read the way native speakers
communicate with each other naturally.
d.
English language teaching materials should link to
each other to develop a progression of skills, understandings and language
items
It will help ensure that the resultant materials have coherence, and that
they clearly progress specific learning goals while also giving
opportunities for repetiotion and reinforcement of earlier learning.
e.
English language teaching materials should be attractive
Some aspects of criteria that are particularly pertinent to materials
designers such as physical appearance that
is initial impressions can be as important in the language classroom as they
are in many other aspects of life; user-friendliness
which materials should also be attractive in terms of their ‘usability’; durability that is if the materials need
to be used more than once, or if they are to be used by many different
students, consideration needs to be given to how they can be made robust to
last the required distance; and ability
to be reproduced: language teaching institutions are not renowned for
giving their staff unlimited access to color copying facilities, yet many
do-it-yourself materials designers continue to reproduce eye-catching
multicolored originals, and suffer frustation and disappointment when what
emerges from the photocopier is a class-set of grey blurs.
f.
English language teaching materials should be flexible
Choosing ESP materials determines the running of the course and
underlines content of the lesson. Good materials should help teachers in
organizing the course or what is more it can function as an introduction into
the new learning techniques, and support teachers and learners in the process
of learning.
Good materials should be based on various interesting
texts and activities providing a wide range of skills. Selecting an appropriate
material regarding the main criteria is an essential phase in organizing each course.
It may happen that learners’ needs and expectations are not met due to
wrong choice of material.
Concerning the ESP activities that is necessary to
keep in mind the context that should be consitent with studying subject matter
such as warming activities or pre-teaching, we can use various types of plays,
puzzles, collocation grids, questionnare, etc; receptive activities-work
with a text itself, reading, listening; productive activities-practicing of
acquired knowledge. Work in pairs, in grops or individual with help of teacher
who take notice of using target language; follow-up activities, we can practice
it in a form of creative homework, exercises.
Conclusion
Developing materials are needed to help students to
understand easily and as the provided sources to practice English language
skill particularly in enriching conversation abilities.
Material development is one of the most
characteristic features of ESP in practice and a large amount of ESP theachers’
time may well be taken up in writing materials. The following are the steps in
developing material (Hutchinson and Water, 1987:106)
1.
Defining objective
There are principle must be
considered as guide in defining, objective:
-
Materials provide a stimulus to learning
-
Materials have to organize teaching-learning process
-
Materials embody a view of nature of language and learning
-
Materials reflect the nature of the learning task
-
Materials can have a very useful function in
broadening the basis of teacher training by introducing teacher a new
techniques
-
Materials provide models of correct and appropriate language use.
2.
Selecting the model of material design. The model
consists of four elements: input, content focus, language focus and task.
a.
Input: this may be the text, dialogue, video
recording, diagram or any piece of communication data, depending on the needs
that have been defined in analysis.
b.
Content focus: language is not an end of itself; but a
means of conveying information and feelings about something.
c.
Language focus: it aims at enabling learners to use
language, but it is unfair to give learners communicative tasks and activities
for which they do not have enoughof the necessary language knowledge.
d.
Task: the ultimate purpose of language learning is
language use. Materials should be designed, therefore, to lead towards a
communicative task in knowledge knowledge they have built up through the unit.
3.
Writing materials. The following are the steps in writing the material:
a.
Identification of need of material.
b.
Exploratoion of need
c.
Contextual realization of material
d.
Pedagogical realization of material
e.
Production of material
f.
Students use of material
g.
Evaluation of material
References
Hikmawati, Djuwairiah Ahmad. “Developing Greeting And Self-Introducing
Materials Dealing With 2013 Curriculum Of The Seventh Grade In MTsN Balang-Balang".http://journal.uin-
alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Eternal/article/view/4119/4454
Rimma Bielousova. “ Developing Materials for English for
Specific Purposes Online Course within the Blended Learning Concept”. TEM Journal. http://www.temjournal.com/content/63/TemJournalAugust2017_637_642.
pdf
Sitti Nurpahmi. (2014). English for specific purposes an integrated approach.
Makassar: Alauddin University
Press.
Comments
Post a Comment